[EN] CA – China and Global Crises: The “Culture of Reluctance” – Oct 2014



1. China and Afghanistan after 2014 (Jade Wu)

2. The US vs. China: Ideological conflict in Iraq (Marc Julienne)

3. China, France, and Germany: Models of engagement in Mali (Angela Stanzel and Abigaël Vasselier)

4. China and Pakistan: Crisis partner or a partner in crisis? (Angela Stanzel)

5. How China sees the crisis in Ukraine (Abigaël Vasselier)



Western hopes that China will take greater responsibility for dealing with international crises are likely to be dashed, according to the latest issue of China Analysis published by the European Council on Foreign Relations and the Asia Centre. The paper concludes that China’s “Culture of Reluctance” – a term borrowed from German foreign policy – will continue to prevent it from becoming a “responsible stakeholder”. It will contribute to solving international problems only when its core national interests are directly threatened and it is unable to be a “free rider”.

This policy paper examines Chinese attitudes towards Afghanistan, Iraq, Mali, Pakistan and Ukraine, outlining China’s deep suspicion of other powers’ ulterior motives for involvement. It shows how Chinese analysts see the United States plotting to draw it into the vortex of Iraq and the Middle East.
It concludes that China is highly selective about where it gets involved. Its global engagement is motivated by a desire to protect its own interests and improve its international image:

  • China will have to become non-militarily involved in the Afghan peace process because US and European troop withdrawal could impact security in the neighbouring province of Xinjiang. This could facilitate terrorism and a “drug economy” inside China’s borders as well as threatening the security of China’s investment in extractive industries and infrastructure projects in Afghanistan.
  • The threat from Islamic terrorism prompted Beijing to contribute troops to the UN peacekeeping operation in Mali to protect its investments in the region.
  • Pakistan is of huge strategic and economic importance to China and military and trade relations have been close for more than six decades. However, despite increased anti-terrorism cooperation, the creation of an economic corridor giving China access to the Arabian Sea and Indian Ocean is hampered by the uncertain security situation.
  • While it is still difficult to reach a full assessment of the impact of the Ukraine crisis, some analysts believe China’s economy will benefit from the implementation of European and US sanctions against Russia.

In his introduction to the analysis, Francois Godement, Director of ECFR’s China and Asia programme comments: “China has interests rather than friends and these interests suggest above all the need to exercise caution. The overall picture that emerges is of a China that is too restrained to act as a great power, and that decides its involvement on a highly selective case-by-case basis. Perhaps most importantly, it reserves its hard power strength for China’s immediate neighbourhood.”

François Godement

[EN] China_Analysis_Oct2014

Citer ce billet
sulmipark (2014, 30 octobre). [EN] CA – China and Global Crises: The “Culture of Reluctance” – Oct 2014. Les carnets d’Asia Centre. Consulté le 22 mai 2024, à l’adresse https://doi.org/10.58079/mj5s

Vous aimerez aussi...

Laisser un commentaire

Votre adresse e-mail ne sera pas publiée. Les champs obligatoires sont indiqués avec *

Ce site utilise Akismet pour réduire les indésirables. En savoir plus sur comment les données de vos commentaires sont utilisées.

Rechercher dans OpenEdition Search

Vous allez être redirigé vers OpenEdition Search